Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:01:17 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My point being...our company probably cares more about 'properly'
curating collections than Most I have heard about (or seen).
I cant answer for management...since I am not one.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>Behalf Of Ron May
>Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 12:30 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Management Interference in Standard Archaeology Procedures
>
>
>In a message dated 8/3/2007 11:16:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight
>Time, [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>While I understand you were supporting My side Ron...our
>company would NEVER sell bottles...or get rid of any
>collections. Please don't make such suggestions.
>
>
>
>Ok, I accept your statement that the collection from this
>nationally significant site will be preserved in perpetuity
>and that no artifacts will be sold or discarded. I wrote
>"tongue-in-cheek" and in anger over what I perceived to be a
>threat to what had been a completely protected site. But will
>management honor your promise that none of the collection
>will be discarded before it gets to the San Diego
>Archaeological Center? What about culling and the practice of
>discarding common things?
>
>Moreover, the fate of this collection has nothing to do with
>the hundreds of collections your company has curated in the
>past. I see no reason for bringing up all the other
>collections in this context.
>
>Ron May
>Legacy 106, Inc.
>
>
>
>************************************** Get a sneak peek of the
>all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>
|
|
|