Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Jul 2007 09:00:02 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Poo. What made the original "deciders" experts about the old list? Did they fork over money for conservation of the hanging gardens? Why should the world's peoples not get to decide on which sites they think are spectacular? Just because there is a sort of global democracy involved in voting does not mean that countries without spectacular sites are being discriminated against. How friggin' politically correct do we have to be?
The quibbling by UNESCO reminds me of a stream of comments on hist-arch about how archaeology is presented by movies and TV shows. Some folks complained about the obvious and frequent inaccuracies. Other argued that anything that gets the public talking about archaeology gives us openings to engage the public notions and perhaps to correct them when need be.
Jeffrey L. Boyer, RPA
Project Director
Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico
mail: P.O. Box 2087, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504
physical: 407 Galisteo Street, Suite B-100, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
tel: 505.827.6387 fax: 505.827.3904
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
"It might look a bit messy now, but just you come back in 500 years time." --Terry Pratchett
________________________________
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY on behalf of geoff carver
Sent: Fri 7/6/2007 7:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: 7 new wonders of the world
democracy & popularity contests vs. the experts:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/6272956.stm
______________________________________________________________________
This inbound email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
______________________________________________________________________
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including all attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this message. -- This email has been scanned by the Sybari - Antigen Email System.
|
|
|