This inquiry was posted on another listserv, Early Americanists, but I thought maybe some of you might be able to assist Ms. Hutter. You may post to either listserv, or respond to Dr. Griffin directly; I can forward your response if you'd like.
   
  Amy

Edward Griffin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
  Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:49:33 -0500
From: Edward Griffin <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Taboo about touching corpses
To: [log in to unmask]

One of my graduate students, Liz Hutter, brought this question to me, 
and I blush to confess that I have no answer. So I thought I'd send it 
to all of you and hope that somebody will point us in the proper 
direction. I can forward replies to her. Here's Liz's query:

In my research (late eighteenth century) on preventing and saving 
individuals from accidents that could cause sudden death, I have come 
upon a couple of brief references to social taboos that prevented people 
from touching or assisting an apparently dead body because corpses were 
not supposed to be touched. I have been trying to locate other primary 
and/or secondary discussions of such a taboo about corpses. Where did it 
come from? Why was a corpse not to be touched, especially one without 
visible indications of illness? I surmised at first that the literature 
on premature burial might provide some clues, but I haven't had any 
luck. I would consider anything from the 18th and 19th centuries; the 
17th century, too, if that is relevant. Do you have any ideas of sources 
that might illuminate reasons for this taboo? Or suggestions about where 
such information might be found?


Edward M. Griffin
Department of English
University of Minnesota
[log in to unmask]



Amy C. Kowal, RPA 
Department of Anthropology 
Florida State University 
Tallahassee, FL 32306-7772 
(850) 644-4281 
[log in to unmask]
 
---------------------------------
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels 
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.