BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:06:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Mike Stoops wrote:
>I agree with some of the above and take exception with some of the above.  

What I presented was a summary of the experience of actual beekeepers,
researchers and authorities working with African Bees in California; they
fully intend to keep them out of the gene pool. Those who fail to practice
tough measures get africanized. 

The notion that marked queens are liable to be superseded is plain nonsense.
I know this from 30 years of experience. The primary cause of supersedure is
junk queens. I have seen 3 year old marked queens countless times, including
many *should have* been superseded.

Peter Borst
Danby NY USA

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2