Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:39:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Okay, I think I know the answer to this but somebody please set me
straight if I'm wrong ...
I've been looking at mid-late nineteenth jiggered and/or molded
bowls, where the exterior rim is salt-glazed and both the interior
and exterior (below the rim) are Albany slip-glazed. Since none of
the Albany slipped surfaces show any salt-glazed effects
(orange-peel), it would appear that none of the salt in the kiln is
reaching the Albany surfaces. Therefore, I assume that "stacking" of
the pottery is effectively impeding the interaction of the salt
vapors with the Albany slipped area.
Now ... I think I can visualize the stacking arrangement ... but it
seems inevitable that the vessel at the top or the bottom of the
stack would be at least somewhat affected by the salt ... But I have
yet to see any evidence of that.
Would appreciate any clarifications or comments that would alleviate
this stressful line of thought.
--
Mark C. Branstner
Illinois Transportation
Archaeological Research Program
209 Nuclear Physics Lab, MC-571
23 East Stadium Drive
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone: 217.244.0892
Fax: 217.244.7458
Cell: 517.927.4556
[log in to unmask]
"There is also an artificial aristocracy founded on wealth and birth,
without either virtue or talents ... The artificial aristocracy is a
mischievous ingredient in government, and provisions should be made to
prevent its ascendancy."
- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
|
|
|