Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:23:59 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Quickbee wrote:
But the entire point of that article was that there is little
difference between the various choices in smoker fuels, as
combustion products and by-products are highly variable when
a smoker is actually smoking (smoldering).
"highly variable"??
read again ,
In his article Blowin' Smoke James Fisher concludes:
So, no matter what you burn in your smoker, your 'clean, cool smoke' is a
mix of superheated toxic chemicals and carcinogens that cannot possibly be good
for you, your bees, or your honey if used in excessive amounts.
Bottom line, easy on the smoke. It's nasty stuff.
Just as in my initial reply to the request to discuss this topic:
"I have my concerns with what people have used to create smoke especially
toxic smoke.
So what isn't toxic?
That's the point that should be discussed."
Walter
Ontario
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|