BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 04:16:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
--- Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

In reference to the "the patchwork test"
>
> OK Joe. Tell us again why a properly done test like
> the above is not valid
> *in your opinion*.

Ok Bob, Sure!

A one season test proves zero in my book with new
hives! This test would be considered primitive by
research standards no matter what the testing was
trying to prove. Small cell is not the issue here but
rather methods used.  If you want the researchers to
put* merit in your testing* you have to follow their
rules. They have to be able to go out and do the same
experiment and get similar results. I have ran many
many similar tests on hives. I have published none as
I know what researchers think of primitive tests.


Joe Waggle ~ Derry, PA
Small Cell Beekeeping
‘Bees Gone Wild Apiaries'
http://www.biologicalbeekeeping.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Organicbeekeepers/



__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2