Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:00:38 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-disposition: |
inline |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks, James-
There's nothing like learning to swim by being thrown in the pool with
all your clothes on- but that's CRM.
I never expected to be doing Industrial Archaeology. I do find this
ironworking business is the most interesting topic so far, however.
Marty Pickands
>>> [log in to unmask] 07/06/06 1:48 PM >>>
Tahawus used a high titanium ore, so there may well be some "odd"
things at the site. Best bet is to contact Gordon Pollard at
[log in to unmask] He has been working in the area and knows a
good deal about Tahawus. Bob Gordon at Yale ([log in to unmask])
can probably also help. I have copied both of them. My "expertise" is
in 18th century operations. Although my MA was about the failure of a
1770s furnace that used a titaniferrous ore. But you get very
different products from a cold blast.
James Brothers, RPA
[log in to unmask]
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:12, Marty Pickands wrote:
> I'm addressing this particularly to James and all you
Michigan-types.
>
> We are in the process of cataloging some artifacts from around the
> base
> of the "New Furnace" (ca. 1854) at the McIntyre Iron Works in
Tahawus,
> N.Y., and have found numerous pieces of large (5-10cm) flakes of
iron
> containing a fair amount of silicate. They are fairly thick (up to a
> centimeter) and have a layered texture. They look most of all like
the
> rust flakes that have fallen off an old cauldron I have in my back
> yard,
> except that they have no formed surface. They were located on or
near
> the casting floor. What are they? Are they some sort of slag? I can
> provide photos off list, if you wish.
>
> Marty Pickands
> New York State Museum
|
|
|