Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:25:27 +1000 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
8bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That native of the community of illiteracy - the Oxford English Dictionary - has an entry "impact, v.". Citations of its use as a verb go back to 1601. The last citation is dated 1972.
>
>Subject: standards
> From: Tim Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 22:52:33 -0400
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>Yargh! I feel like one of those crusty old curmudgeons, at least one of
>which shows up on everyone's dissertation committee, but in the interest of
>students and the impressionable young that might be on this list, I'm
>compelled to point out:
>
>Amy, "impact" is not a verb. I know the native speaker is always right (Dr.
>Hardaman beat it into my brain) but we don't have to be natives of the
>community of illiteracy.
>
>Marcy, the expression is not ". . . fair so well . . ." but " . . . fare so
>well . . .", as in "wayfaring" or traveling.
>
>Academic and bureaucratic gobbledy gook is bad enough, but can't we maintain
>some devotion to clear writing?
>
>Tim T.
>pedantic curmudgeon
|
|
|