Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:34:33 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, it looks like that very approach/topic has been treated comprehensively
(for northern Baja) here:
Land of Chamise and Pines: Historical Accounts and Current Status of
Northern Baja California's Vegetation (University of California Publications
in Botany)
Richard A. Minnich, Ernesto Franco Vizcaino
Amazon gave me enough "teaser" peeks inside that I've already got a copy
ordered.
Bob Skiles
~~~~
"Smithers! Get that bedlamite to an alienist." ~ C. Monty Burns
----- Original Message -----
From: "geoff carver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: carrizo = phragmites in SoCal?
>I don't suppose the ethnobotanists would have another view of this, would
> they?
> How would current folk/scientific labels compare with those in historical
> records?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bunny
> Sent: October 11, 2006 18:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: carrizo = phragmites in SoCal?
>
> The fly in the ointment of this discussion is that there are two kinds of
> cane commonly called "carrizo," both of which are known to grow in
> Southern
> California
>
|
|
|