HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:36:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
 
In a message dated 6/7/2006 4:55:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

California has had
relatively tough cemetery laws for some  time.  I recall six inhumations
is the threshold for a cemetery as was  indicated earlier, but for fewer
then six, the area of the remains is to be  considered a legal cemetery.
Ron, do you remember if that is correct.   I am trying to stretch my
memory way back to the research we did for Fox  Point.



Stan and others,
 
Native American sponsored changes to California Health & Safety laws  changed 
the threshold requirement for six burials to qualify as a cemetery. Now  all 
it takes is one human burial to require protective laws to go into effect.  
Those of our ranks who have been involved in cemetery relocation know the  
Coroner and other officials have fairly strict procedures for public noticing of  
an intent to relocate burials. Cemeteries need not be marked or recorded to  
qualify as cemeteries. Knowingly going through a cemetery with a skip  loader 
(eg. any mechanical device) is a felony. Things have changed since  Fox Point, 
Stan, but I have not worked on a human grave since 1973. Funny you  should ask, 
as I just penned a description of "Anastasia" down at the Royal  Presidio de 
San Diego in that portion of my memoirs.
 
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2