Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 7 Jun 2006 20:36:54 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 6/7/2006 4:55:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
California has had
relatively tough cemetery laws for some time. I recall six inhumations
is the threshold for a cemetery as was indicated earlier, but for fewer
then six, the area of the remains is to be considered a legal cemetery.
Ron, do you remember if that is correct. I am trying to stretch my
memory way back to the research we did for Fox Point.
Stan and others,
Native American sponsored changes to California Health & Safety laws changed
the threshold requirement for six burials to qualify as a cemetery. Now all
it takes is one human burial to require protective laws to go into effect.
Those of our ranks who have been involved in cemetery relocation know the
Coroner and other officials have fairly strict procedures for public noticing of
an intent to relocate burials. Cemeteries need not be marked or recorded to
qualify as cemeteries. Knowingly going through a cemetery with a skip loader
(eg. any mechanical device) is a felony. Things have changed since Fox Point,
Stan, but I have not worked on a human grave since 1973. Funny you should ask,
as I just penned a description of "Anastasia" down at the Royal Presidio de
San Diego in that portion of my memoirs.
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.
|
|
|