Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:50:26 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello all,
Thanks for the comments-especially the ones by Allen Dick
Bob stated>
>> The HFCS bees started dying at 6 days ( in both the 1974 & 2006 USDA-ARS
>> tests). The HFCS bees continued to die at a greater rate than the sucrose
>> fed bees until the end around day 29.
My comments/questions:
Allen responded in a later quote that (as he recalled)the difference in
lifespan was about 10% on average....I take that to mean that if the average
lifespan of a bee fed sucrose was 33 days, the average lifespan of a bee fed
(their particular mix used ) HFCS would be be roughly 30 days.
Allens "10%" figure is certainly PRACTICAL information that I could use in
my deciding which/any syrup to use. You know that is not a lot of difference
in my mind. It also makes me wonder if honey (as Bill Truesdale reported
earlier) might turn out to produce an even lower lifespan.
An observation here: I have noticed that there are several topics-really
fundamental beekeeping questions- that are danced around year after year,
but lacking in definitive answers. The feeding of bees and type of feed
used is one of those. I would personally love to hear of a few studies
that were "clinchers" that contained statistically verified USABLE data more
than a thousand generalizations and speculations.
A good example that clarifys what I am saying is the test done recently
comparing two types of pollen substitues versus polllen. Oh how refreshingly
clean and simple were the results!.
I am truly grateful for the info I have recieved here, and I am aware that
this forum is for discussuion of about any topics related to bees, but I
would love to to see a place where some of the basic questions were
addressed AND resolved.
Even if the tests were made with the understanding that they were only for a
particular type of bee and environmental condition, that would be helpful to
lay the groundwork for a truely useful database.
Now a question:
Allen, you said that you "seemed to recall a study" saying that bees fed
sucrose were longer lived.
I certainly would appreciate any references you or anybody could point me to
concerning the HFCS vs Sucrose vs honey.
Also, Bob, if you had a hard number concerning the average lifesspan of bees
in the studies you cited-sure would like to see it.
As I mentioned, I have about 300 hives, and plan to go to at least 500, and
I am raising queens that show mite resistance.
By the way,Jerry, of the roughly 1200 hives I know of in the N. alabama
region, I think we have been spared the scourge that is currently afflicting
beekeepers elsewhere.Treatments are Apistan mostly, followed by Coumaphous
and possibly others. I havent treated any of mine for about a year now(nor
do i plan to).,about 100 untreated for 2- or 3 years. My winter deadouts
seem roughly the same as I have observed from previous winters- from about
3 to 10%..
John Horton
(wondering if these are windmills I am charging.....)
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|