HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask], arch-l <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:57:21 +0100
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Museum shows 116-year-old orange
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3 lines) 
not really sure if/how i could comment on this; it definitely fits in there as an "heirloom," obviously of great sentimental value, but... how would it be classified if someone excavated, for example, the museum? would this orange even be retrieved, or simply discarded...?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/staffordshire/7068974.stm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2