 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:11:17 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Organization: |
Archaeological & Historical Consultants, Inc. |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
And if you work for a CRM firm, the taxpayers are probably paying for it
anyway. After all, where does most of our funding in the US come from?
You guessed it.
But I have learned a lot from this list, including finding good
references and making useful contacts. Keep up the good work.
Meli Diamanti
MORGAN A RIEDER wrote:
> HISTARCH and other archaeological listservs combine scholarly discourse with idle chit-chat. There's nothing wrong with that (indeed, that's the nature of our listservs), but I think it's appropriate to confine the chit-chat to our free time after working hours. Otherwise, the company has to pay for it (if you're employed by a CRM firm) or the taxpayers have to pay for it (if you're a federal employee).
> Just my 2 cents' worth.
>
> Morgan Rieder, RPA
>
|
|
|
