HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:48:14 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject:
From:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Thanks Lyle.  I realized the answer to my question the second after I hit the 
send button, i.e., the Custer battlefield reconstruction.  I guess I was 
thrown by the question of one Spencer caliber vs. another, and the request for 
inter-site comparative cartridge data.  Seemed that a single-site battlefield 
reconstruction would be pretty idiosyncratic, at least in terms of the surviving 
cartridges.  

Mark C. Branstner    

Great Lakes Research, Inc.
210 E. Sherwood Road
Williamston, MI 48895

1.517.347.4791 / [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2