Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v728) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 21:18:24 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Nov 26, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Mike Stoops wrote:
>>
>>
> One consideration concerning buying queens instead of
> cells is that introduced queens, if accepted, start
> laying within a day or two of release, hopefully
> prolifically. With cells you have to wait for the day
> or two or three before they emerge. Then there is the
> three to hopefully less than seven day wait for them
> to fly and mate, and then the time it takes for them
> to start laying. Time between cell purchase and
> having a laying queen, four days to ten? At
> approximately 1000 up to 2000 eggs a day that would
> add up to anywhere between 2000 to 16,000 workers the
> caged queen would have on the cell queen. Hive is
> stronger, faster, with the caged queen. Course, my
> math could be wrong but it's approximate.
Hi Mike and all
I have used queen cells exclusively for several years. I purchase
them from a local producer who has written about his breeding program
in ABJ. I see the delay in brood( I figure 15 days) as a positive.
15 days without brood is 15 days without varroa( see thread on caging
queens for varroa control). There are several disadvantages to using
queen cells(weather being #1), but when weather cooperates I have had
late May splits with 2 frames of brood and a queen cell produce 200+
lbs (highest in last 5 years 347 lbs). 2005 was a poor year for my
splits as late June and early July were hot(30C+) and dry. The
plants matured before my splits were strong enough. Goldenrod flow
was good.
Bob Darrell
Caledon Ontario
Canada
80W44N
>
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and other info ---
|
|
|