BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:44:23 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
--- George Fergusson <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> And hey wait a minute! If the AHB foraged more
> efficiently (less travel,
> less competition) why didn't they produce MORE?
>

Hi George,

I can appreciate that it's always fun to try and pick
apart a study. I provided a few excerpts, but it is
always helpful if one were to read the study.

"....throughout the study the colonies with African
mtDNA consistently had slightly greater brood
production, almost twice as much pollen collection
activity, and traveled approximately 600 m less per
round trip of foraging"

One efficiency expression with the AHB is its
reproductive output in rearing more brood than the
European group (i.e. fitness).  Reproductive output is
positively correlated with foraging efficiency.



Joe Waggle ~ Derry, PA
Small Cell Beekeeping
‘Bees Gone Wild Apiaries'
http://www.biologicalbeekeeping.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Organicbeekeepers/



__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2