BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Rip Bechmann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 May 2005 08:44:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I can't speak as an "expert" on the topic, but based on experiences in
Panama with adulterated "honey" detection, I was given to understand that
"natural" differs from "fake or adulterated" honey enough at the
molecular level to be detectable.  It involves the ratio of sugars
present, types of sugar as well as sugar derivatives that are artifacts
of the manufacturing process.  Is there a chemist in the house?

Floral source is another matter.  Pollen present in honey can be somewhat
misleading since the pollen collected in conjunction with a flow may or
may not reflect the nectar source.  Discarding pollen by foragers is an
observed behavior.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2