Um, maybe I'm misreading this message, but it seems that these two
sentences are connected:  

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]> on February 2, 2007 at 9:16
AM -0700 wrote:
>
>I think we need an all-day prime-time plenary session on Vauban
>forts at
>the next SHA meetin' (are ya listenin' Larry or David?) in lieu of
>femmist
>theory stuff.
...
>
>
>Hurray, this is some REAL historical archaeology for a change!!!  ;o)
>
My thesis involved feminist theory and was certainly real historic
archaeology.  Could we please not revisit the conference timeslot
issue this way?


Kristi Benson
Tr'iinjoo oonoodài’ gwidàl hàh dha’aii
Researcher, Gwich'in Social & Cultural Institute

Telephone    867-777-3298 Ext 30 
www.gwichin.ca