Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: requeening: cell vs mated queen
From:
Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:05:58 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Sorry Dee, I'll be more to the point.

A cell or a virgin queen used to requeen a colony will lead
to a forager based population ratio later on when compared to requeening
with a mated queen that can continue to lay full force. A mated queen that
s caged for 7-14 days has the same effect as a cell/virgin for that matter.

With a coming honeyflow in mind, does a colony with little brood/nurse bees
and a lot of foragers produce more honey than a colony with a lot of brood
and nurse bees?
Will the first invest in stores or in population build up? Which one would
you prefer?

L

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV