Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:16:39 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John Wiser replies to me:
>Steve Schwartz wrote:
>
>>One-Hit Wonder implies a composer who wrote one good piece or a piece
>>that is SO much better than the rest of his output.
>
>Pardon me, but it implies nothing of the kind. It is ordinarily intended
>to described a composer with one conspicuously POPULAR work ("one-hit,"
>get it?) and doesn't call the quality of all other works into question.
Sorry, but it does, at least in idiomatic English. I agree with your
definition as primary (which I felt too well known to require mention),
but the secondary definition does exist, at least in the low circles I
move in. If all language were confined to the dictionary, we'd be a lot
poorer.
Steve Schwartz
***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery. For more information,
go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|