Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:29:57 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Norman M. Schwartz wrote:
>Steve Schwartz responds to David Harbin:
>>I disagree. Do you know how many recordings of standard rep there are?
>>Nobody has the kind of detailed knowledge to reliably pronounce. Indeed,
>>I remember Neville Marriner on a British program (My Music?) being
>>subjected to a "blind" test of listening to a Handel recording. He was
>>rather hard on it. Of course, it turned out to be his own recording.
>
>Of course, but without any listening at all, if NM read the label on the
>Concert Arts disc, as of course did of the 'Gramophone experts', he would
>have recognized it as a scam. "It's not rocket science".
Was the BBC was playing a Concert Artists recording/re recording of
Neville Marriner's own work? If it was a blind test why show him the
label? Truly, it would have been a work of genius for a pianist like
Hatto to have recreated a Handel symphony.!!!! (grin) The point Steve's
making is that it "is" difficult, since a conductor can be mistaken by
his own work. It really "is" not at all as easy as people seem to think.
Anne
[log in to unmask]
***********************************************
The CLASSICAL mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R)
list management software together with L-Soft's HDMail High Deliverability
Mailer for reliable, lightning fast mail delivery. For more information,
go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|