that just doesn't make sense, in terms of general aims of scientific 
enquiry, etc.
but then, maybe that just shows how little i know about why other people do 
archaeology
which is maybe something we need to take into account when reading reports 
or borrowing data?
how are "reflexive methods" doing in historical archaeology these days?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron May" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: Concealed objects in buildings


>  Fourth, some archaeologists are just plain
> ethnocentric
What a shame some archaeologists hang  up
> their "anthropology mantle" when they don their trowel and notepad.