HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Leslie C. \"Skip\" Stewart-Abernathy" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:27:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Hi.  I've found improved earthenware sherds processed as chicken 
gizzard stones under numerous circumstances.  The best was a cluster 
in a turkey carcass buried in the backyard of the Block family house 
in Washington, Arkansas.  I'm convinced we're finding turkey gizzard 
stones at an early Mississippian site, this time as processed 
debitage that looks highly polished and water worn.  My colleagues 
are not so sure, but they're wrong!

At 08:36 AM 4/28/2006, you wrote:
>We have found both gaming disks and chicken stones in various contexts and,
>as Joe says, part of the interpretation depends on the context.  They are
>also distinguishable by size (gaming stones are generally larger -- 1 inch
>or so in diameter), shape (as Anita says, gaming stones are carefully
>rounded) and overall wear patterns (chicken stones look like sherds that
>have been in the water for a long time).  Some of the gaming pieces that we
>have seen seem to have been carefully selected to include particular
>designs, especially on tin-glazed  painted pieces.
>
>
>Meta
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Meta F. Janowitz
>URS Corporation
>437 High Street
>Burlington, N.J. 08016
>609-386-5444
>
> 
>
>  This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. If you receive 
> this
>  message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should not 
> retain,
>  distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should 
> destroy
>  the e-mail and any attachments or 
> copies.
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2