Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:10:54 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"what bugs me is that adrian (& hodder, and a few others) insist on
throwing out comments along the lines of "excavators must be treated
as well-educated and/or experienced and multi-skilled specialists, and
they must be paid and led accordingly well" without ever quite
explaining how we can go about doing this... & i don't see how we can
explain to developers that we need more money for our "embodied,
sensual encounters"... any thoughts/comments (aside from complaints
about this message being too long)?"
I took issue and thought this an issue...were I work no one signs
contracts with the excavator, P.I.'s do with their patron/clients.
On 4/15/05, John <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Not that I disagree with any of this, George, but what does it have to do
> with the application of reflexive, post-processualist theory to fieldwork?
>
> John
|
|
|