Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:10:44 +0100 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<001a01c630c8$47505fc0$795d8e40@adrian> |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I absolutely agree. One shouldn't use a program until one has learned to
construct a Harris Matrix by hand AND thoroughly undestood what one is
doing. Then again: If you don't undestand stratigraphy, DON'T DIG.
David Bibby
>----------------------------------------
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:06:57 -0800
praetzellis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> HISTarchers,
>
> The advantages of using one of these programs are well known: they are fast,
> help preserve your sanity, and they draw the little boxes for you.
>
> However, NOT using a matrix program forces the archaeologist into a deeper
> understanding of the stratigraphic complexity of their site. Being forced to
> go through the process of working out these relationships by hand means that
> you truly understand the site and can spot apparent stratigraphic
> impossibilities that are (dare I say it?) mistakes on the part of person in
> the field.
>
> Peace,
>
> Adrian Praetzellis
> California
--
<[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|