HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:18:38 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original
Subject:
From:
Matthew Sterner <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Elizabeth,

Metal detectors are generally ineffective for what you're interested in
(finding structural remains). You should actually be pursuing some sort of
geophysics study. Maybe a combination of magnetometer and resistance.

mas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Elizabeth Hoag" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Question RE metal detectors


> Dear List members,
>   I am looking into the use of metal detectors on historic sites as a
> method to identify subsurface artifacts; in this case looking to locate
> a possible early 18th century structure.
>  Can anyone please recommend  (off-list is fine)any studies or other
> references to the use of metal detectors in historic archaeological
> settings?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Elizabeth Hoag, RPA
> [log in to unmask]
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2