HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Iain Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:10:48 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Geoff,

 

You have to be a bit clearer here.

 

There was archaeology paid for and sponsored by the Fascist states to
support their particular views – Mussolini had an obsession with Augustus
and sponsored much archaeological work that glorified Augustus. 

 

There were also various archaeologists, rumoured to be paid agents of the
CIA, involved in Chile opposing the elected Marxist government there – I
stress this is only a rumour though. 

 

But in terms of the history of archaeological ideas, in one sense Marxist
archaeology stood in the same camp as processual in arguing that the facts
simply do not speak for themselves (as opposed to a “Wiggish” view of the
past) but separate from processual in its emphasis on the social and
political relationships and structures in understanding the past. 

 

Of course it all depends on which “Brand” of Marxism you are talking about.

  

yours

 

Dr Iain Stuart

JCIS Consultants

 

P.O. Box 2397

Burwood North,

NSW       2134

 

ph/fx  (02)  97010191

 

HYPERLINK "mailto:[log in to unmask]"[log in to unmask]

HYPERLINK "mailto:[log in to unmask]"[log in to unmask]

 

Check out the website at  HYPERLINK "http://www.jcis.net.au"www.jcis.net.au

 

 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.2.0/756 - Release Date: 10/04/2007
10:44 PM
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2