December 15, 2004
PUBLIC MEANING OF ARCHEOLOGICAL HERITAGE
“The Public Meaning of Archeological Heritage” conference was held October
27-28 at the University of Maryland Inn & Conference Center in College
Park. Participants in the training explored the public meaning of
archeological heritage from international, national and regional
perspectives. Case studies focused on parks, museums, descendent
communities and local communities. Because of the location of this
training, many of the case studies were specific to the meaning and
interpretation of African American archeological heritage in the middle
Atlantic region.
A description of the four module curriculum, of which this training is
Module I, may be found online at
http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/SITES/inspire/index.htm. Module II – “Archeology
& Interpretation” – consists of two parts, Interpretation for
Archeologists: A Guide to Increasing Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
<http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/ifora/index.htm> and Archeology for
Interpreters: A Guide to Knowledge of the Resource <h
ttp://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/afori/index.htm>, and trains archeologists and
interpreters together in the skills and abilities needed to carry out
effective interpretation of archeological resources.
For further information contact Barbara Little at (202) 354-2130 or
[log in to unmask]
PUBLIC ARCHEOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES: A TIMELINE
Discover some of the major events in public archeology between 1784-2004 in
this new web feature at <http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/timeline/timeline.htm>.
This timeline highlights key events throughout those years, including new
legislation, the development of new organizations and public programs,
significant publications, and interesting cases involving the protection
and preservation of sites (both terrestrial and submerged) and collections.
ARCHEOLOGY & ETHNOGRAPHY PROGRAM CHANGES
The Archeology & Ethnography program has undergone several structural
changes in recent months. First, A&E has been restructured into two
independent programs – the Archeology program and the Ethnography program.
Frank McManamon will continue as program manager of the Archeology program,
and also as NPS Chief Archeologist and Departmental Consulting
Archeologist.
Second, the responsibility for overseeing NPS compliance with the Native
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) has been moved to
the Office of Indian Affairs and American Culture (IAAC) in the
Intermountain region. Park NAGPRA will be supervised by Cyd Martin,
director of IAAC. Mary S. Carroll will continue as Park NAGPRA Program Lead
and will relocate to Denver.
And finally, the Archeology program welcomes Martha Graham and Karen Mudar,
both of whom transferred from the National NAGPRA program to the Archeology
program effective November 15, 2004.
ARCHEOLOGICAL CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE
The NPS Archeology Program was represented at a three-day meeting sponsored
by the National Science Foundation held to discuss development of a
"cyberinfrastructure" for archeological data and information. A
cyberinfrastructure for archeology will eventually involve common
archeological data standards or "metadata" standards that will enable
researchers and archeologists documenting archeological resources to
provide a common set of markers that will permit the comparison of
archeological data and information among different projects and databases.
The Reports portion of the National Archeological Database (NADB-R) is
recognized as an initial necessary tool for identifying potential
archeological information and data for comparative research and sharing.
More and more archeological data and information are available digitally.
Effective means of accessing information and comparing data sets among
different projects need to be developed and utilized. Projects already
underway for specific data and information include the Chaco Digital
Initiative (www.chacoarchive.org), led by Steve Plog at the University of
Virginia, and the Digital Archaeological Archive of Chesapeake Slavery
(www.daacs.org), led by Fraser Neiman at Monticello.
These days, public archeology projects create most of the archeological
data and information. It is important that agency archeologists be aware
of this aspect of archeological research, curation, and data management and
participate in developing solutions to this challenge.
|