HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alasdair Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:03:32 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Paul Courtney wrote:

> As we are allowed to discuss WWII- I have heard Russians
say in TV
> interviews say they weren't too keen on receiving the
Shermans as part of
> the arms shipments.

While Ron May wrote:
> Ian,
>
> More than paid for all those Russian arms, we also shipped
hundreds of
> tons of material to Russia. A late friend's husband was in
the merchant
> marine and got a medal from Russia for surviving the
Murmansk Run, in which
> a great many American ships were sunk by Nazi u-boats.

Without for a second meaning to downplay the important
contribution of the United States towards supplying the
Soviet Union (and Britain, for that matter) during WWII,
it's worth noting that Britain was also heavily involved in
the Arctic convoy system, both in terms of shipping and
supplies.  Churchill's war memoirs feature some typically
pungent comments about Stalin's apparent underappreciation
of Britain's efforts and losses in the Arctic convoys.

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr.  Alasdair Brooks
Material Culture Specialist / Lab Archaeologist
SHA  Newsletter Current Research Editor for Australia/NZ
 1/62 Gooch Street
Thornbury, Vic  3071
Australia
 03 9416 8484
0429 198  532
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2