Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:38:18 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 06:13 AM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>Perhaps the only solution is to marry the fields into an entirely new
>discipline where not only do students learn about archaeology and
>anthropology, but
>also history, architectural history and historic preservation. Applied
>culture
>studies is a broader category that could encompass all these under one
>umbrella. Maybe it is time for the academic fields to change in the face of
>practical research instead of history and research for posterity and
>intellectual
>exercise.
We can call it Cultural Resources Management. Seriously, though, we are
supposed to be able to do all of that to get the job done.
I have always said that it is often far more important to know what NOT to
do than to know what to do - you have to be aware of your limitations (i.e.
skills). By "your" I mean the firm's, your personal, the budget's, the
record's, the site's, ...
Dan W.
|
|
|