Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 22:13:55 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I split from good hives (subjective evaluation) in spring and got poor
> returns. Plenty of drones around. The majority of those that did
> survive turned out to be tourist hives i.e in migratory terms hives
> that were taken around the country side for a look see but did not
> produce much honey. I ended up buying some queens to re-queen
> and then got good results. Tried splits again the next year with
> similar reuslts. So I gave up and kept to purchasing queens.
You are not alone in that. Emergency queens work for some and not for
others. It's a mystery. I suspect that there are more than a few factors
at play, and that is why I'd like to see some studies.
> Where is the proof? We know the end result but are we interpreting
> the right cause? I know beekeepers who now admit that when they
> introduced queens to their hives, they had high nosema counts.
> Reality tells us that we often re-queen poor performing hives. Why
> were they poor performing?
Good points all, but we were discussing splits from (I assume) good hives,
which levels the playing field.
> We have ceratin species of trees in Australia that when beekeepers are
> working them, the introduction rate for queens is poor. This includes
> bought queens or queens raised by the beekeeper. All real but we
> know the results but not the reasons.
True again. Many factors.
>> Therefore, I am very curious. Obviously, it is in the interests of
>> those who make their money by raising and selling queens (and
>> advertise in magazines) to study and promote use of those queens,
>> and in the meantime trash the queens that any beekeeper can raise
<snipped>
>
> I hope you are not including me in your above example.
I wasn't meaning you. I was speaking generally.
> My often expressed quote is that if you have a method that works for
> you why change? So if the split method works for you, stay with it.
> So don't use a broad brush to tar everyone that rasies questions
> contrary to your opinion.
>
> I am turning away orders for queens so I don't have to malign others
> to get orders.
Let's not take things personally. They were not meant that way. When I was
buying Australian queens, you were one of my preferred suppliers. I have
often mentioned that some of the best bees I ever had were from Aus, over a
decade ago, and although I forget from whom they came, I suspect it may have
been you, since you were one of my suppliers at the time.
> If it was easy, everyone would be a beekeeper and what
> would the price of honey be then?
Good point. ...And if bees did not sting?
allen
A Beekeeper's Diary: http://www.honeybeeworld.com/diary/
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|