CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2003 07:38:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Robert Peters replies to me replying to him:

>>>What is the mysterious X which makes Bach's music so touching that even
>>>an agnostic guy like me feels like a Christian when listening to the St
>>>Matthew-Passion?
>>
>>Talent?
>
>Yes, but talent for what?  For composing?  For moving people?

The short answer is yes.

>Every film composer can move people - but can he (or she) touch the soul?

Some do, some don't, just like other composers.

>Is touching the soul through music only a technical question of notes
>and chords?

What else could it be?  AND is Bach's X different in kind or degree or
both?  Bach certainly has his own artistic "personality," but so do many
other composers.  It's both an advantage and a limitation.  Bach could
no more be Chopin or Debussy than either one of them could be him.

The idea of the mysterious X (just drop it in your tea for greatness --
I'm kidding) is a highly Romantic one.  For me, an artist does things
better than other people, rather than has a greater Soul than others.
Too many composers, poets, and artists were not only idiots in anything
other than their art, but rather unlovely characters as well.  I know
enough of Bach's life to realize he was no saint and that he had no
special insight on life.  However, he did compose music better than most.

Steve Schwartz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2