Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:46:44 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ok. I'm not quite sure how to respond to your last post, Ron, except to say
that I asked for advice and now I know where you stand. I'll take your
thoughts into perspective.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron May" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: Urban archaeology methods question
> But Jane, what you seem to really be asking is for approval. Assuming this
> is a federal project and a Section 106 test, surely there are provisions
> for
> protecting the site? How about parking vehicles over the features? How
> about
> having a forklift drop those heavy steel plates (half inch thick steel)
> over
> the features until you can get to them? We all have had bulldozers
> breathing
> down our necks, angry construction crews, and bottle hunters lurking in
> the
> darkness. Still, if you call it archaeology you cant just rip it out with
> a
> backhoe.
>
> Ron May
> Legacy 106, Inc.
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.1/279 - Release Date: 3/10/2006
>
>
|
|
|