HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jane Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:46:44 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Ok. I'm not quite sure how to respond to your last post, Ron, except to say 
that I asked for advice and now I know where you stand. I'll take your 
thoughts into perspective.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron May" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: Urban archaeology methods question


> But Jane, what you seem to really be asking is for approval. Assuming this
> is a federal project and a Section 106 test, surely there are provisions 
> for
> protecting the site? How about parking vehicles over the features? How 
> about
> having a forklift drop those heavy steel plates (half inch thick steel) 
> over
> the  features until you can get to them? We all have had bulldozers 
> breathing
> down  our necks, angry construction crews, and bottle hunters lurking in 
> the
> darkness.  Still, if you call it archaeology you cant just rip it out with 
> a
> backhoe.
>
> Ron May
> Legacy 106, Inc.
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.1/279 - Release Date: 3/10/2006
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2