Carl,
One of the most important roles archaeologists take in the drama of public
meetings, such as standing before a city council or a commanding officer or a
board room, will be to effectively convince the decision-makers that the
archaeology they have found is important. This is not about Section 106 consultation,
this is about proper stance, facial expressions, use of your hands and arms
to convey messages and not be derailed by their actions. Nearly all law schools
train their aspiring attorneys in acting, manner of dress, diction, and how
to prepare your mind and body to convey anger, confusion, or positive thinking.
A truly successful archaeologist must speak before groups of skeptical land
developers, hostile, community planning groups, realtors, farmers, various
kinds of government staff, and always present the results of fieldwork in a way
that will win-over the audience. I have seen the worst possible presentations by
archaeologists who simply lose control, walk like a homeless person, dress
like a hobo, and blow-up when challenged. As well, I have seen some
archaeologists who work the crowd like spiritual revivalists and personally know one who
has an incredible reputation for working decision-makers. Courses in public
speaking, acting, and professional presentation are something that absolutely
should be in graduate academic programs where their students will go out into the
world and speak for archaeology.
It was my intent in raising this issue of acting to open this subthread for
discussion. The ultimate goal is to reduce the threat a decision-maker has to
archaeology by being effective in our presentation. We want them to get on the
wagon and become as excited as we are about what we have found. We want them
to carry our message with the same enthusiasm as we bring into their meetings.
It is for these reasons that I recommend acting as one of the skills for
archaeology.
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.
|