HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 04:11:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Josh,

Check the HISTARCH archives for your answer to granite and ironstone, as this
has been discussed at length in the past. I just added my thoughts that
pottery industries were not as discriminate as archaeologists in marking ceramics
truthfully. They were appealing to a mass market, many of the buyers being
somewhat snobby about what they bought. There was a fashion to buy harder past
ceramics and even if the core of the pottery was soft the makers might have
marked it as granite to sell their products.

Ron

ATOM RSS1 RSS2