Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:43:53 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>D. Murrell writes
> As a commercial beekeeper, at that time, FGMO didn't meet my needs. It was
> too labor intensive. Was too soft. And, although FGMO may be underneath
> the
> radar as a food contaminant, I find it hard to believe that putting that
> much petroleum product in the hive doesn't contaiminate hive products.
> It's
> a far cry from organophosphates, but most petroleum products have some
> health risks associated with them. It might not remain under the radar
> forever.
>
> Some Thoughts
> Dennis
>
I concur with everything except this last comment. I suppose one could call
adulteration contamination? This is the substance ingested for a laxative.
Alden Marshall
B-Line Apiaries
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|