Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:37:31 +1300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Adrian Wenner says that my suggestion that some bees that follow a dance
use the information to avoid the already discovered food in order to
find new sources, is "an interesting rationale, but not very
scientific".
I doubt if science philosophers would see this as a proper defence of
the odour hypothesis. If Adrian thinks my hypothesis is not very
scientific, he should say why.
`Science' is difficult to define in such a way that finds universal
acceptance, but my Oxford dictionary says that a definition of science
is that it is `an organized body of knowledge that has been accumulated
on a subject'. My suggestion is based on such an organized body of
knowlege accumulated by many researchers, (including Adrian), and so I
claim that my suggestion is indeed scientific.
Regards,
Barry Donovan
Canterbury Agriculture and Science Centre
Lincoln
New Zealand.
______________________________________________________
CAUTION: The information contained in this email is privileged
and confidential. If you read this message and you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of all or part of the
contents is prohibited. If you receive this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately.
Any opinions or views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender and may not represent those of their employer.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|