Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:48:13 -0400
Subject:
Re: Loyal to a Label?
From:
Bert Bailey <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Don said that...

>Having a collection 90% devoted to Deutche Grammophon likely insures
>high-quality recordings.  However, such a high percentage is not viable
>when one acquires hundreds of discs each year.

The reason for this last is the label's high price.  At least as
importantly, to my mind and no doubt others', is that it would also be
a relatively narrow collection.  It's why, further on his point, I
wouldn't be loyal to this or any other label that isn't entirely
encyclopedic.

Skip that: which one is, and why be loyal at all?  My 'loyalties' or
fixations are about the composers I come to admire or enjoy.  After that,
it's a pursuit of soloists and conductors which pushes my musical horizons
farther.  I know completists who relentlessly pursue recordings by
Hamelin, or Argerich, say -- or, sometimes, a special work.  For me,
that kind of pursuit's usually far less obsessive than my hunger for
more by a given composer.

Bert Bailey

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV