To critique Arthur accurately, you need to see the movie. In this version,
she was a Breton not a Pict, or at least that was implied when she accused him
of killing his own people. The movie alleged he was half native and half Roman.
Ah, but it is all just fiction and made to be fun. I remain intrigued by the
statement in the beginning of the film that new archaeological evidence
pointed to Arthur as closer to the time frame and culture depicted in this movie.
Thanks to those who have attempted to answer that question.

Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.