BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Fall requeening
From:
Michael Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:31:49 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<006a01c3f218$0931c760$5864fea9@orac>
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-71E11070; boundary="=======627F38C4======="
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (277 bytes) 

>
>Mike replied...
>  > From my personal experience I see the above as a very very rare
> > occurrence at least in the bees we use in the U.S. My guess would
> > be one in around 200 hives has two laying queens.


Actually Bob said that. I said I had found 7 of 100 with two queens.

Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2