Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 2004 20:59:40 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----- Original Message -----
From: Roger White
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 8:56 PM
Subject: Raising queens
I thought that I would give my own opinion on the subject. I always regard supersedure queens as inferior. They are always raised from a failing/old mother and as such cannot be expected to have the physical or genetic qualities of a queen in her prime that is used to produce daughters. As breeder queens go, the difference between the daughters raised from a two and three year old breeder queen are very obvious. The daughters of three year olds are always of a lower qualtiy than the two year olds. In human terms it is like expecting a quality baby from a fifty year old woman - sometimes it is ok, but sometimes not! I always replace supersedure and swarm queens with a good quality queen that I've bred myself and mated it to selected drones in a mating station - they have no equal from a human beekeeping point of view. By this I mean that they should have all the characteristics I need to produce a decent crop of honey with little extra input from me.
Best regards
Roger White
Superbee Cyprus.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|