HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
and then there's HISTORIC v. HISTORICAL
From:
David Rotenstein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:27:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
In a similar vein, I'm always amused by the CRM types who identify
themselves as "historic archaeologists" and what they do as "historic
archaeology." I'm kind of glad they don't practice historical archaeology
because then we'd have to fault them for not reading Schuyler's article on
the distinction.

DSR.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2