HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:14:00 +0000
Content-Type:
Text/Plain
Parts/Attachments:
Text/Plain (10 lines)
absolutely
like the repeated argument that constructing a database does not double your workload, that sieving really is a good idea, that a total station is not too expensive to take into the field (if you have one, isn't it too big an investment to leave locked up in the office all week?), etc.
i'm just fine-combing hodder on drawing profiles & his assumption that the drawing staff and people excavating also have experience & know what they're doing, but...

"David Babson" <[log in to unmask]> schrieb:
> However, the necessary processes for
> identifying, understanding and recording profiles and site stratigraphy
> are quite time-consuming, and difficult to explain to supervisors
> without archaeological background, especially in a CRM context.  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2