HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Bibby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:10:44 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I absolutely agree. One shouldn't use a program until one has learned to
construct a Harris Matrix by hand AND thoroughly undestood what one is
doing. Then again: If you don't undestand stratigraphy, DON'T DIG.

David Bibby

>----------------------------------------
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:06:57 -0800
praetzellis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> HISTarchers,
> 
> The advantages of using one of these programs are well known: they are fast,
> help preserve your sanity, and they draw the little boxes for you.
> 
> However, NOT using a matrix program forces the archaeologist into a deeper
> understanding of the stratigraphic complexity of their site. Being forced to
> go through the process of working out these relationships by hand means that
> you truly understand the site and can spot apparent stratigraphic
> impossibilities that are (dare I say it?) mistakes on the part of person in
> the field.
> 
> Peace,
> 
> Adrian Praetzellis
> California

-- 
 <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2