HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Timothy Scarlett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:05:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Whoa.
These two guys know each other.  This was meant in a friendly,  
joking, and warm way.  Just let it all go.  This is why it's bad form  
to argue too much politics on an email group dedicated to archeology.
Tim Scarlett


On Sep 2, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Christine Garst wrote:

> Talk about irrelevant!  What would you call slamming someone like  
> this?
> Maybe unkind is a better word than irrelevant.
>
>
>>>> [log in to unmask] 9/2/2005 12:27:42 PM >>>
>>>>
> We understand Ed, and yes you are.
>
>
>
>> From: "TENNANT,EDWARD W" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Ignore Previous Post (yeah, that'll happen)
>> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 13:16:14 -0400
>>
>> Sorry everybody, I didn't mean for that last email to go out to the
>>
> whole
>
>> list. I'm trying to learn a new email client, and I'm an idiot.
>> Also, sorry about the 'irrelevant' post.
>> -Ed
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2