HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:31:17 +1000
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Subject:
Re: Functional categories
From:
Iain Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Actually I was thinking of something like the excellent Parks Canada, Glass
Glossary, except for every artefact category. It would be about 50000 pages
I guess. Not even Mitch would publish it.

However then comes the problem of getting everyone to use it in the same
way. What's the expression "like herding cats".

Then come the issues of multiple functions and recycling.

Perhaps KISS is the underlying principle.

Iain Stuart

[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Carver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 6:10 AM
Subject: Re: Functional categories


does the smithsonian still put out that humungous taxonomy?

"Iain Stuart" <[log in to unmask]> schrieb:
I imagine it would
> be a sort of Munsell Book of Colour but with 5000 more pages.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2