 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 07:27:44 -0500 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 12/1/2004 7:20:56 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
What if any responsibility does a CRM professional (archaeologist,
architectural historian, etc.) have for old reports? For instance, if
it becomes clear that parts of a report were incorrect, is there any
obligation to publish an errata?
James H. Brothers IV, RPA
If so I, for one, have a lot of work to do!!!
But really, what can you do? I have corrected phase ii errors in the phase
III report, and edited errors out when I reprinted things. But it wouldn't be
possible to go back and, with the wisdom of experience and hindsight, fix
EVERYTHING...
Carl Steen
|
|
|
