HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:29:19 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject:
From:
James Brothers <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
A major resource here in the East is maps from the Civil War. Both the
US and Confederate Govts did extensive mapping, especially of
battlefields. In Virginia the maps show roads, houses, mills, etc. and
can be very useful.

  On Aug 2, 2004, at 6:09 PM, Ron May wrote:

> I think there are a lot of archaeologists interested in the oral
> histories
> and filming of military battles. Ever since archaeology at Little Big
> Horn, the
> SHA Conference has increased manifold on papers concerning order of
> battle,
> mapped bullets, trench warfare, and how people really lived during
> wartime.
> Hollywood films do distort, but so can be said of oral videos of old
> soldiers.
> This is really not much different than reading letters and reports from
> battlefield veterans vying to improve their personal records. The fun
> part is to test
> the written and filmed history in the field.
>
> Ron May
> Legacy 106, Inc.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2