Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:00:20 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kris, et al.
As I recall, the Brits used central place theory for analyzing settlement patterning for several periods...I'm thinking Hodder and Orton in the 1970s. It also shows up in the gray literature and, I suspect, more than a few master's theses.
Jim Gibb
Annapolis, Maryland USA
----- Original Message -----
From: John McCarthy
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: central place theory
Hi Kris -
While not discussed in quite so many words, William T. Langhorne's 1976 article on "mill-based" settlement patterns in Schoharie County, New York, applies central place concepts borrowed via prehistoric settlement patterns research. It was in HA volume 10:73-92.
John
Hello all:
Does anybody happen to know if anybody has ever applied
Christaller's Central Place Theory to historic archaeology? I know
I've seen about twenty articles on prehistoric settlement
patterns, but I don't have any in historic archaeology.
Kris
K. Kris Hirst
Archaeologist
The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
950 50th Street
Marion IA 52302
319/373-3043
fax 319/373-3045
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
|
|
|